- Not Helpless with a Heart of Gold March 29, 2020
- South Frontenac COVID-19 Response: Updates to Service Delivery – March 20, 2020 Media Release March 21, 2020
- Much Ado About Talking February 26, 2020
- High Speed Internet Access Plans February 26, 2020
- February 8 Town Hall Meeting Report February 13, 2020
- Protecting the Public: Septic Development January 30, 2020
- Endings and Beginnings December 30, 2019
Steve on High Speed Internet Access… Steve on Sydenham Water Public Eng… Residents and Specie… on Endings and Beginnings Steve on Restrictions on Old Schofield… Steve on Frontenac County Regional Road…
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- May 2014
Last winter, Council passed a motion to establish a public engagement strategy on the Sydenham water system. A report is expected in the next few months. The following comments are my contribution to this strategy:
One quarter of those people who live on the water lines are still not hooked up and a further 17% are hooked up but either not using the water or only making limited use of it. That is, after 15 years, 41% of the properties on the water lines are paying 1000 dollars a year to not use a service: an almost unbelievable demonstration of palpable anger. It is a pretty big raspberry from a significant number of people in Sydenham to the Township.
This expression of anger undermines confidence in the Township, it divides the community, and it shows that if the Township does not do a better job, we will not be able to effectively bring in collective services in other hamlets when they are needed. We already know that significant areas within the hamlet boundaries of Inverary and Harrowsmith are not able to be developed because of lack of water, and the quality of ground water is a concern that will just grow with more development.
The Township needs to set aside any residual anger at the people not fully using the system, and try to develop a better working relationship. There were significant mistakes made establishing the system.
At the same time the system is going to continue. The majority of the hamlet is using the system and many are appreciative of its water quality benefits and increased property values.
Establishing a better working relationship with all on the water system will take a couple of years and effort on the Township’s part. I also do not see an alternative except using the legal hammer of government to force a large group of residents to do something they do not want to do. A situation I don’t think anyone wants. And a situation that would further poison other attempts at establishing communal water and waste systems.
The core principles of a public engagement program should be:
- Recognizing the failures of implementation, as well as the benefits of the system.
- Honesty and openness on how the system is operating.
- Full public discussions on proposals going forward.
- Regular engagement with all who pay for the system.
Three concrete proposals that might help are:
1. Hold a public meeting in the relatively near future to up-date the community on the water system, answer any questions and listen to any comments about the past, present and future. This should be its primary focus; a second meeting could be held latter to go over specific proposals: possibly after proposals two and three have been implemented.
2. Creation of a water system public advisory committee to including water system users or potential users. Without being specific here the committee could meet a couple of times a year, get updates and be an initial sounding board for proposals. Alternatively, there could be bi-annual public meetings open to all on the water system. They need to be regular and relatively often, even if they are occasionally boring.
3. A yearly written report distributed to all properties on the system with invitation for questions and comment.
South Frontenac’s Fire Chief’s quarterly reports contain all sorts of information on fire and rescue services in the Township.
In his last report, as it is in most, the largest number of calls that our volunteers respond to are medical calls, that is calls with no fire or rescue component.
I asked the Chief about these calls. The Chief said that our emergency services get called out for medial emergencies when there is no ambulance able to respond within 15 minutes. In the first nine months of this year our services responded to 212 medical emergencies. In other words, South Frontenac residents called 911 for medical help 212 times when there was no ambulance able to respond within 15 minutes. Last year the total number was 243, and we are likely to exceed that this year.
Our fire and recuse personnel are well trained first responders, they do their best and can initiate very valuable, potentially lifesaving, first aid, like control bleeding, administering oxygen and delivering a cardiac shock. Nonetheless, they do not have more advanced lifesaving skills like administering medications nor are they able to transfer a patient to hospital.
One comment at Council was that recent cuts in funding for ambulance services was partially to blame, as are overcrowded emergency rooms, which tie up ambulances.
Regardless, we are still at risk. I presented a motion to council earlier this fall asking the provincial government to maintain, at least, the current level of ambulance services. Unfortunately, it was defeated in a 5-4 vote. Perhaps, if the Fire Chief’s report had come out earlier, the vote would have been different.
Johnson’s Point Species-at-Risk Benefit Permit
There is a new twist in the Johnson’s-Point-development-and-its-threat-to-the-provincially-significant- wetland-and-species-at- risk saga that has been going on for years.
One of the small victories at the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) that approved this project was an order that the developer apply to the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) for a benefit permit: a permit that requires the MNR to evaluate the site for any species-at-risk and issue orders to protect, or mitigate, the damage to those species. I have written before about the limitations of this process.
The MNR issued the Johnson’s Point benefit permit this past month with significant portions blacked out. The OMB ordered that the benefit permit has to be incorporated into the conditions of approval for the development, conditions the Council has to vote on. The conditions of approval also guide how site plans for the development are created and how the building department issues permits.
After final approval is given to the project, it is the Township’s job to enforce the conditions of approval. Fulfilling all of these responsibilities seems impossible if the recommendations in the benefit permit are not known.
The planning department is working to have a full, un-redacted version, which has no deletions, attached to the final conditions of approval.
While obtaining the full benefit permit is a work in process, it is one that needs to be completed for the OMB decisions to be honoured and the Township to do its job monitoring the development.
Official Plan Consultation Results
The first round of pubic consultations for the new Official Plan have concluded. 125 people provided input at the open houses and 129 responded to the online survey. The most common words attendees at the open houses used to describe what they love about South Frontenac were: lakes, close to the city, community, rural feel and people.
72% felt that growth should take place in the villages and hamlets. 18% of respondents identified the environment, 13% water quality, 13% the economy, 10 % growth and 8 % for each of agriculture, lakes and rivers and rural character as top issues to be addressed in the Official Plan.
The top five issues that respondents to the online survey want discussed in the Official Plan process are were: natural environment, climate change, water quality and quantity, state of the lakes and affordable housing.
There were many more comments on the challenges the Township faces, the vision for the Township and a variety of other issues. A full list of all comments and further analysiscan be found in the agenda for the November 25 Development Services meeting.
These results provide the basis for initial research and drafts. There will be more opportunity for the public to comment in the spring and fall next year.
Desert Lake Causeway
After years of promises and consultations, progress has been made on redeveloping the Desert Lake Causeway. The new culverts are in and the road bed is wider. The new boat ramp, while not yet fully usable, looks much safer with the concrete mesh base. It is already a significant improvement. The work will be finished next spring with a separation between the beach and the road way, parking spaces, hard top and a dock by the boat ramp.
The agreement on Council was that the culverts would not permit boat access between Desert Lake and Holleford Lake. At this falls low water level, it was possible to get a canoe through the culverts, though it is tight. With normal summer conditions this would be a difficult, if not impossible, maneuver.
New Official Plan
The community process to write the Township’s new official plan is truly underway.
Close to 100 people came to the Storrington Lions Hall and a further 60+ came to the Sydenham library to learn about the new official plan process and give their initial input. At both meetings people were attentive, asked staff lots of questions, and participated in the opinion gathering exercises.
There were many comments on a wide range of topics. Staff will collate all these, plus information from the online survey, and consider them in their background work on a new official plan.
A casual glance through the responses at the meetings showed two issues that attracted a lot of attention. A desire to protect and improve our water, lakes, wetland and the environment was on many participants minds. Second, focusing growth on hamlets also had broad support.
There will be more opportunities for those who missed stage one to have their say. And everyone will have more opportunities to comment on the concrete proposals as they become available. It will take the better part of two years to complete the process. If you want to be on the contact list for updates please send me a note or contact the planning department.
Last winters the many freeze-thaw cycles caused parts of some roads to disintegrate. To address this need about six hundred thousand dollars for urgent repairs and upgrades was added to last summers road work. Murvale Road has been rebuilt and sections of Holleford Road have had major repairs. Thank you for your patience and thank you to those users of other roads where work was delayed by a year to facilitate this urgent work. The last major repair resulting from last winter is the rebuilding of North Shore Road which will happen next summer.
Draft 2020 Budget
The draft Township budget for 2020 has been posted.
Council asked Staff to prepare a budget with a 2% increase over 2019: this draft achieves that goal. Now we have to see what that means in terms of service delivery. That is the work for the next month.
On Tuesday November 5 at 7 pm, there is Council meeting specifically to hear from the public their comments on the draft budget. What should be left in, what should be taken out, and what is missing. If you would like to speak at the meeting please contact the Township Clerk, Angela Maddocks, 613-376-3027. You can also pass along your comments in writing.
Council is debating the full budget at a special meeting on Thursday, November 9 from 9 – 2 in the Council chambers. This meeting is open to the public. Please pass on any thoughts you have; I would be happy to enter them into the debates.
Progress on Signs?
Many people have commented on the “mess”, the “unsightly chaos”, and the “blight on our environment” – take your pick -caused the many signs on Township roads that are fallen over, grown over, tacked to trees, put on Township road signs or simply littering our ditches.
Staff have been asked to report back to the Development Services Committee on how to deal with the mess. The report is expected early in the new year.
Some of the signs advertise directions to events and family parties. Some advertise local businesses and community happenings, all of which seem helpful: though they also can be very unsightly.
If you have comments on a signs-on-public-roads policy, please comment. Do we ban them? Or, are their regulations that could control the clutter and permit the transfer of community information.
Official Plan Public Input Starts
The first public meeting on the new Official Plan (OP) was poorly attended. There are two more meeting, please come and tell the Township staff what kind of community you want South Frontenac to be. Your comments will be reflected in the first draft they produce.
Some issues that will be considered are: the natural environment, affordable housing, climate change action, bigger but fewer hamlets, agricultural lands, more rural lots, more communal services, and commercial and industrial development.
There are two more meetings: have your say:
- Storrington Lions Club– October 3rd, 2019 – 7:00 – 9:00pm
- South Frontenac Council Chambers– October 23rd, 2019 – 5:00- 7:00pm
There is also an online survey on what kind of Township you want in 20 years. Please fill it in: https://www.southfrontenac.net/en/open-for-business/official-plan.aspx
Provincial Policy Statement Changes
The province has drafted changes to the Provincial Policy Statements (PPS). These documents outline how development will take place in the province. Municipalities must work within these guidelines. They are important.
The PPSs cover: healthy communities, resource management and public health and safety.
While there maybe other significant changes three stood out to me:
1. Under the proposed changes, companies developing an aggregate mine could use rehabilitation measures to argue that the project will have no negative impact on the environment.
This seems to allow an aggregate operator to develop a quarry in an environmentally sensitive area or on prime agricultural land as long as they have a plan to rehabilitate the area when the operation closes. In other words, companies would be able to dig up a sensitive area, strip the soil, remove the aggregate, and, in the future, replant and argue that there has been no negative impact on the land.
This proposed change would have significant short-term and long-term negative impacts, but it is nonetheless the proposal
2. In a variety of places, the proposed PPS mandates that municipalities develop plans to adapt to climate change. Only once does it mention that actions may be taken to lesson climate change. It also has a separate section protecting petroleum extraction which could be read to include fracking.
The documents accept that there will be significant changes in the climate, but do not encourage action to lesson the damage from climate change. This is the “pound of cure is better than an ounce of prevention” strategy. It is neither financially nor environmentally sustainable.
3. The document encourages rural areas to develop communal services, like water and sewer systems. Preference is given to private systems where municipal ones are not “available, planned or feasible”; and feasibility includes a municipalities willingness to pay.
For instance, in a new subdivision or rural land condominium developers would be encouraged to install a private communal water and sewer system.
A few problems immediately come to mind.
- It is more expensive for private developers than governments to access capital to develop these systems leading to higher housing prices.
- If you had a couple of developers is an area, say around Inverary or Harrowsmith, the services would have different owners and possibly use different technologies making it harder, that is more expensive, to develop a broader community system when that is needed.
- As the law currently stands, if any of these private systems fail, the Township is obligated to take them over. The Township’s ultimate liability can be lessened by regulations, covenants, and deposits. All of these require monitoring, and potential legal action, all of which involves more cost above what would be incurred with a municipal system. And none of which remove the Township’s ultimate liability.
Please read the proposed PPSs on line and comment. There maybe other sections you find positive or concerning.
Encroachment on Public Lands: Docks
The Township’s Development Services Committee is considering a public land encroachment policy.
Historically, on a case by case basis, private individuals have been allowed to develop on pubic property. The immediate issue sparking this discussion on whether we need a more uniform approach is the use of the Desert Lake causeway by private, unsanctioned, docks.
The initial discussion focused on a general principle that public lands should be protected for public uses.
When a strong argument can be made, like access to a lot, or historic use of docks for a commercial business, Council could consider granting a long-term lease for encroachment on public land.
The summer felt like a re-setting time for the Township: the new Chief Administrative Officer started his job, input for the next three years strategic pan was being collected and developing the new Official Plan started. A few other issues were percolating that will also have significant impacts on the Township.
Planning Changes: A Win for Large Developers
Last spring the provincial government passed an omnibus bill, “More Homes, More Choice”. It is not clear that it will lead to more affordable housing, but it will definitely shift planning power strongly in favour of large developers and away from community input and control.
The government has changed the rules Local Planning Appeal Tribunal back to those of the old Ontario Municipal Board which takes power away from local councils: a change that will lead to longer, more expensive legal proceedings, particularly around subdivisions.
The new legislation also shortens the time allowed for Councils and communities to consider new development proposals. Extra reports and community input into both the Johnson’s Point and Hartington developments changed the original developer proposals for the better. Yet this input was not possible even under the longer timeline rules. The situation will be worse with the new shorter timelines.
In our community many residents are away for part of the year: longer timelines are needed to get their input. The number and complexity of studies required for most developments demand time for the community, let alone Township staff and Councillors, to adequately assess them, and get a second opinion if necessary. The legislation also restricts the right of residents and community groups to appeal the Land Tribunal decisions on subdivisions, further limiting public oversight of large developments.
All these changes strongly favour well-financed large developers. The impacts will be felt when new proposals come to Council.
A proposal to turn plastics into energy through a process called pyrolysis appeared on the Public Works Committee agenda this summer.
Concerns about this technology include:
• It burns plastic which produces significant amounts of greenhouse gases in its manufacture and again when it is burnt.
• The technology is very expensive.
• To be efficient it requires a large guaranteed amount of fuel, effectively encouraging more plastic consumption.
• A more pressing and solvable problem is organic waste. Organics make up about 50% of our garbage. Proven technologies that can turn organics into compost or bio-fuel are cost effective, reduce green house gases and can significantly extend the life of our landfills.
Official Plan Redo Officially Started
At the August Council meeting the Official Plan redo was formally initiated. When finished the new plan will play a major role in how the Township develops over the next twenty years.
To be a good plan it needs extensive public input. A good plan will help South Frontenac develop into the community we want it to be.
Writing a new official Plan will take about two years. Your early input early is important. It sets the tone and ensures that the correct questions are answered to create the best Official Plan.
The first series of meetings for community in-put are being held this fall. If you can, come to any one of them:
September 21 – 9am-11 – Glendower Hall, Westport Road
October 3, 7pm-9 – Storrington Lions Club, Battersea Road
October 23, 5pm-7 – Council Chambers, Sydenham
There will also be an opportunity to online input.
Council will be considering the community input on our next three year Strategic Plan at a special Committee of the Whole meeting, Tuesday, September 10 from 9am-2. Anyone interested in the discussion is welcome to come. Recommendations from that meeting will go to a regular Council meeting for final approval.
Desert Lake Causeway
After many years of planning upgrading the Desert lake Causeway will start this month. Expect traffic restrictions for a few months. The Causeway will also be completely closed to traffic from late in the day on September 26 to September 29: that is a PA-day weekend for the schools allowing for minimal disruption while the culverts are replaced.
Committees are considering regulations for cannabis production facilities, dog kennel noise and licensing of docks on public shorelines. Initial reports on these topics are in the August 26 Development Services Committee agenda.
Two years ago the Knights of Columbus sold their Schofield Camp on Buck Lack. The new owner has undertaken numerous works which have raised concerns that the site would be used for purposes that are not permitted under the current zoning. Township officials have raised these concerns with the new owner a couple of times since the property was purchased.
Recent ads on South Frontenac Buy and Sale Facebook page indicated a wish to run the site as a commercial campground. The following letter was sent from South Frontenac’s Director of Development Services to the owner of the property:
Please be advised that it has been recently brought to the attention of the Township of South Frontenac that the property you own at 6454 Perth Road has been advertised as available to rent on a weekly basis with 4 bunkies and room for 6 campers with power.
As you are aware, the property at 6454 Perth Road is zoned Community Facility (CF) in the South Frontenac Township Zoning By-law (By-law 2003-75). The CF zoning was on the property prior to your purchase. Your lawyer was advised of the CF zoning on the property at the time of your purchase in 2017.
The CF zone provisions and relevant definitions are available in the Township’s Zoning By-law which is available on-line athttp://www.southfrontenac.net/en/open-for-business/resources/Planning-and-Development/ComprehensiveZBL-2003-75-Revised-June-2018.pdf.The CF zone is defined in Section 29 and the definitions are listed in section 3 of the by-law.
Renting the property to a group on a weekly basis with the opportunity to bring trailers on-site does not fit within the list of uses permitted in the CF zoning on the property.
Prior email correspondence in July 2018 with Mr. Orr, indicated you should pursue a rezoning application to establish an appropriate zoning on the property to facilitate your short-term plan.
We met in November 2018 to discuss your long-term plans for the property. At that time it was indicated that any future plans for the property would require a rezoning application be filed for the property and it was suggested that you may wish to engage the services of a planning consultant to assist you with an application. To date a zoning by-law amendment application has not been submitted for your property.
The bringing of trailers onto the property is prohibited except consistent with the South Frontenac Zoning By-law and the Township Trailer By-law (2004-93). A copy of the Trailer By-law is also attached for your information. Please note section 3.1 that states “No person shall use and/or keep a trailer on any property within the Township except in a Trailer Park, where the use is permitted and conforms to the Township of South Frontenac Comprehensive Zoning By-law.”
Until the Zoning is changed on the property, only activities that clearly comply with the CF zone shall be permitted.
Please contact me directly to discuss the situation and how you wish to move forward in compliance with the South Frontenac Zoning By-law and Trailer By-law.